MacBook Pro ME665LL A Core i7 2.7 GHz Specs (Apple Early 2013 15", MacBookPro10,1 (EMC 2673)) - Techable
MacBook Pro with Retina display review (15-inch, 2013) - The Verge
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 Late 2013 Notebook Review - NotebookCheck.net Reviews
MacBook Pro ME664LL/A Core i7 2.3 GHz Specs (Apple Early 2013 15", MacBookPro10,1 - A1398 (EMC 2673)) - Techable
Apple MacBook Pro (15-inch, 2013) review: Apple's high-end laptop gets better battery life and a lower price - CNET
MacBook Pro 2013 (Retina) - 15 inch - Buyer's Guide, November 2023 - Swappa
MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Early 2013) - Technical Specifications
Retina, round two: Apple's 15-inch 2013 Retina MacBook Pro reviewed | Ars Technica
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2013-10 - Notebookcheck.net External Reviews
MacBook Pro with Retina display 15-inch (2013) Review | Trusted Reviews
MacBook Pro 15-inch with Retina Display - 2013 Review - LAPTOP | Laptop Mag
Late-2013 15-Inch Retina MacBook Pro Review: Apple's High-Performance Notebook Tops The Field | TechCrunch
Identify your MacBook Pro model - Apple Support (SG)
Late-2013 15-Inch Retina MacBook Pro Review: Apple's High-Performance Notebook Tops The Field | TechCrunch
MacBook Pro - Wikipedia
MacBook Pro ME874LL/A Core i7 2.6 GHz Specs (Late 2013 15", Apple MacBookPro11,3 - A1398 (EMC 2745)) - Techable
Apple MacBook Pro 15-inch (2013) Review | PCMag
Retina, round two: Apple's 15-inch 2013 Retina MacBook Pro reviewed | Ars Technica
MacBook Pro Retina 15-inch Late 2013 A1398 16GB RAM 1TB SSD | eBay
MacBook Pro ME664LL/A Core i7 2.3 GHz Specs (Apple Early 2013 15", MacBookPro10,1 - A1398 (EMC 2673)) - Techable
Apple MacBook Pro with Retina Display (13-inch, 2013) review: Not a Retina MacBook Air, but awfully close - CNET
Identify your MacBook Pro model - Apple Support
Apple MacBook Pro 15 (Early 2013) - Intel Core i7-3740QM · NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M (2GB GDDR5) · 15.4", QWXGA+ (2880 x 1800), IPS · 512GB SSD · 16GB DDR3 · Mac OS X | LaptopMedia.com
Retina, round two: Apple's 15-inch 2013 Retina MacBook Pro reviewed | Ars Technica
